|
| |
 |
New York Architecture
Images- Gone World
Trade Center 6- The work of
Minoru Yamasaki |
WTC
0-Main
Commentary
1-why
did it collapse?
2-images
from September 11th, 2001.
3-more
images
4-Timeline:
World Trade Center chronology
5-Towers
of Innovation
6-The
work of Minoru Yamasaki
7-images
of reactions from around the world |
Short biography:
1912-1986, American architect, born in Seattle, WA.
He is known for his designs combining aesthetic appeal with functional
efficiency, and he preferred delicate, refined material such as wood and
polished steel to the more conventional rough concrete and brick. His
designs are seen in airport buildings in St. Louis (1951) and Boston
(1968); at the U.S. Consulate General, Kobe, Japan; at the U.S. science
pavilion for the Seattle World Exposition (1962); and at the World Trade
Center complex, N.Y.C.
World Trade Center, New York, NY, USA.
Consists of seven buildings and a shopping concourse.
Most prominent are the 110-story, rectangular twin towers rising to
1,350 ft (411 m), second in height only to Chicago's Sears Tower.
Construction began in 1966, the complex opened in December 1970, and was
dedicated in April 1973.
Commentary by Paul Heyer, Architects on
Architecture: New Directions in America, p194-195:
``Yamasaki's
commission to design the World Trade Center with the New York firm of
Emery Roth and Sons...house(s) anyone and anything connected world
trade. The program presented to Yamasaki, who was selected over a dozen
other American architects, was quite explicit: twelve million square
feet of floor area on a sixteen acre site, which also had to accommodate
new facilities for the Hudson tubes and subway connections-all with a
budget of under $500 million. The vast space needs and limited site
immediately implied a high-rise development that...make(s) the adjacent
drama of Manhattan's business tip seem timid in comparison....
``After studying more than one hundred schemes in
model form, Yamasaki decided on a two-tower development to contain the
nine million square feet of office space. One tower became unreasonable
in size and unwieldy structurally, yet several towers became too
approximate for their size and `looked too much like a housing project';
whereas two towers gave a reasonable office area on each floor, took
advantage of the magnificent views, and allowed manageable structural
system. The twin towers, with 110 floors rising 1,353 feet, ... (are)
the tallest in the world. From observation decks at the top of the
towers it...(is) possible to see 45 miles in every direction....One
distinct advantage of the project's enormity is the architectural
opportunity to advance the art of building. Yamasaki re-examined the
skyscraper from the first principles, considering no ground so hallowed
that it could not be questioned, especially in view of the potential of
modern technology. The usual economic prohibition on `custom-made' was
out, as virtually anything made for the Center would automatically
become a stock item. `Economy is not in the sparseness of materials that
we use,' said Yamasaki of his $350 million estimated cost, `but in the
advancement of technology, which is the real challenge.'
``The structural system, deriving from the I.B.M.
Building in Seattle, is impressively simple. The 208-foot wide facade
is, in effect, a prefabricated steel lattice, with columns on 39-inch
centers acting as wind bracing to resist all overturning forces; the
central core takes only the gravity loads of the building. A very light,
economical structure results by keeping the wind bracing in the most
efficient place, the outside surface of the building, thus not
transferring the forces through the floor membrane to the core, as in
most curtain-wall structures. Office spaces will have no interior
columns. In the upper floors there is as much as 40,000 square feet of
office space per floor. The floor construction is of prefabricated
trussed steel, only 33 inches in depth, that spans the full 60 feet to
the core, and also acts as a diaphragm to stiffen the outside wall
against lateral buckling forces from wind-load pressures.
``The other
primary obstacle to be overcome in the skyscraper is the elevator
system, and Yamasaki has shown himself equally imaginative here. A
combination of express and local elevator banks, called a skylobby
system, it is particularly efficient because it requires fewer elevator
shafts-thus freeing approximately 75 percent of the total floor area for
occupancy; had a conventional elevator arrangement been adopted, only
approximately 50 percent would have been available. The building has
three vertical zones; express elevators serve skylobbies at the
forty-first and seventy-fourth floors; from these, and from the plaza
level, four banks of local elevators carry passengers to each of the
three zones.
``From the
outset, Yamasaki believed that there should be an open plaza from which
one could appreciate the scale of the towers upon approach. There is
little or no sense of scale, for instance, standing at the base of the
Empire State Building. Yamasaki's plaza...(is) sheltered from the river
winds and contained by five-story buildings which...house shops,
exhibition pavilions and a 250-room hotel.... `The World Trade Center
should,' he said, `because of its importance, become a living
representation of man's belief in humanity, his need for individual
dignity, his belief in the cooperation of men, and through this
cooperation his ability to find greatness.' ''
Postscript:
On February 26, 1993, a large
bomb inside a van in the parking garage underneath the World Trade
Center was detonated, killing six people and injuring 1042, in one of
the worst acts of terrorism in U.S. history. The bomb was enormous (1200
pounds of urea nitrate), comparable in size to the Oklahoma City bomb,
causing a tremendous release of energy, with not a single place to go
because it was all closed in. While the explosion created an enormous
crater where the parkade used to stand, the terrorists intention to
topple the 110 storey building was thwarted by Yamasaki's engineering
skill. Because of the load carrying role of the exterior steel columns,
the foundation was unaffected by the blast.

Final Postscript:
September 11, 2001 is a
date we will forever remember, as we helplessly watched two hijacked
airliners deliberately crash into the twin towers. The intense heat from
the large quantity of burning air-fuel eventually caused major
structural failure of the central core, and the towers collapsed at
approximately one hour and 1-3/4 hours later. The central cores imploded
with remarkable speed (nearly free-fall conditions), with the steel
lattice following the rest of the structure down. Our prayers go to the
families of the thousands of casualties, including those of the hundreds
of emergency workers trapped in the buildings as they collapsed.

Other examples of work by Minoru Yamasaki
University Buildings of the American Midwest
Minoru Yamasaki designed buildings for many
universities in the US midwest in what is sometimes called a modified
`International Style'. They include the Irwin library at Butler
University, Indianapolis, IN, the Conservatory of Music and Concert Hall
at Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH, many buildings at Wayne State
University, Detroit, MI, and the Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, OH.
These buildings were all constructed between 1955 and 1963, and bear
many similarities with each other, as well as with the steel exterior
shell of the World Trade Center. Space permits me to show only a few
examples.
Irwin Library at Butler University, opened in 1963.
The Conservatory of Music at Oberlin College
Master planner of the University of Regina
One of his major works was the planning of the University
of Regina and the adjoining Wascana Centre, in Regina, SK, Canada.
This is a 2000 acre park containing the provincial legislature, cultural
institutions, and a new university. Yamasaki was chosen because of his
imaginative concepts and his ability to relate design to the
environment.

Left, University of Regina Library, opened 1967.
Right, Library reading room.
He writes:
``The opportunity to build a completely new and
integrated university on bare land is one which occurs very
infrequently in our times. Normally the planing is hampered by
existing buildings which neither fit the aesthetic objectives nor are
situated opportunely, or by a cumbersome road system or other factors
which impede the development of a fine and truly appropriate basic
concept.
``A University is symbolic of the highest
aspiration of man, and the physical environment which is built for its
activities must strive to attain the nobility of these aspirations. It
must have great dignity and yet not be pompous -- it must be warm and
friendly and yet must give the kind of atmosphere which is conducive
to study and to research. Beyond all this, it must be a useful plant
to serve the needs and functions of the University.''
The concept for the buildings was that they
would be located close enough together that passage between them in the
winter could be provided through connecting corridors in the ``podium''
or first floor of all buildings in the central instructional complex.
Each podium would be larger than the remaining floors of the buildings
rising above it, thereby creating the impression of separate buildings
rising from a common base. The buildings would be constructed around
sunken, landscaped courts which would be accessible visually and
physically by generous windows and doors from the corridors located
along these enclosing walls.
As part of his concept, Yamasaki proposed
``that different architects be used for the various buildings and that
each one be given as much freedom as possible in the design of the
buildings to sit on the podium, including freedom in the choice of
materials providing only that the buildings be in architectural unity.''
The unifying concept and central feature of the instructional core of
the campus was the podium. To achieve this, the level of the podium deck
is constant, and the cladding of the walls of all podia would be a
common material, which would provide a unified base for the buildings.
Yamasaki's 100 year master plan for the
development of Wascana Centre and the overall layout of the University
of Regina were approved in 1962. He was also awarded contracts to design
its first three buildings, which were opened between 1965 and 1967.
There are many obvious similarities between Yamasaki's three original
buildings and podium at the UofR, and the plaza buildings of the World
Trade Center. Unfortunately, in the years since the initial construction
of the campus, major elements of Yamasaki's plan have been abandoned.
Nonetheless, his contribution remains the UofR's most distinctive and
publicly recognizable feature.
The architectural firm, Minoru Yamasaki Associates,
Inc. still prospers.
www.yamasakiinc.com
|
|
back to WTC
main page
|
|