|
notes
|
The first office building to be really influenced by Saarinen's design was begun in 1923, the year after the competition, and it is called the Barclay-Vesey Building because it is on Barclay and Vesey Streets. It was the headquarters for the New York Telephone Company. It is an entire square block in a section of the city that was not part of the grid of streets. So it is not a rectangular block, it is on an oddly shaped trapezoidal block. It was designed by the architectural firm of McKenzie, Voorhees & Gmelin. This firm had been designing telephone company buildings since the nineteenth century and although the firm had different names, it was actually the same firm. So when this commission came to the firm, it was no big deal. They gave it to an associate named Ralph Walker, a very talented young associate, to design this building. Walker was very influenced by Saarinen's design and was interested in how to turn the zoning law to his advantage, and how to design buildings with dramatic setback massings that would make the buildings an important and dynamic part of the skyline of New York.
And so Ralph Walker designs one of the great buildings of the 1920s. It has a solid horizontal base and then it has the soaring verticals with window bays between vertical piers just as on Saarinen's design. It has very dramatic setbacks marked by buttresses and sculpture until you reach the top with its limestone detailing and its sculptural work. This building was widely published and it captured the imagination of New Yorkers. It was also very influential in getting other designers to use these kinds of forms on the city's architecture. It was so successful that Ralph Walker became a partner in the firm, which became known as Voorhees, Gmelin & Walker. And Walker designed several other very important skyscrapers in the 1920s.
The top of the building, as you can see, is very dramatic. You were supposed to be able to enjoy this building and experience its drama from both close up and from far away. This building, which, when it was completed in 1926, was right on the waterfront, now cannot be seen from the water because of Battery Park City. It was in an area of relatively low-rise commercial buildings, so this building towered over all the nearby buildings in order to be visible both from the water and from the land. Its top would capture your attention, and on the lower floors the ornament was very complex so you could also enjoy this building from close up. Walker, like Sullivan before him, wanted to use an ornamental vocabulary that was not historically based, and he actually invented his own style of ornament, which has this very complex foliate design in which are interspersed little babies and animal heads. And even in the center, above the door, there is a bell, the symbol of the telephone company.
From the AIA Guide:
"Distinguished, and widely heralded,
for the Guastavino-vaulted pedestrian arcades at its base, trade-offs for
widening narrow Vesey Street. The Mayan-inspired Art Deco design by Ralph
Walker proved a successful experiment in massing what was, in those years,
a large urban form within the relatively new zoning 'envelope' that
emerged from the old Equitable Building's greed. Critic Louis Mumford
couldn't contain himself. A half century later, Roosevelt Island's Main
Street used continuous arcades as the very armature of pedestrian
procession. Why not elsewhere in New York to protect against inclement
weather and to enrich the architectural form of the street? Why indeed,
not next door, at 7 World Trade Center?"
Breathing new life into a
Manhattan landmark
By Michael Reis
After two of its
facades were destroyed in the September 11 attacks, expert stonecarvers
have been called in to replicate the intricate stonework at the historic
Barclay-Vesey Building in New York City.
| In the aftermath of the
September 11 terrorist attacks, the damage to lower Manhattan was
not limited to the World Trade Center buildings. Many
architectural landmarks surrounding the complex were also damaged,
some of them severely. One of these structures was the historic
Barclay-Vesey Building, which is currently undergoing a
restoration effort that includes the re-creation of its
intricately carved limestone elements.
Originally built from 1923 to 1927 as the
headquarters for New York Telephone, the Barclay-Vesey Building
was significantly damaged when the fourth structure in the World
Trade Center complex -- Building Seven -- collapsed. When Seven
World Trade Center fell, steel girders from the building hit the
ground with such incredible force that they penetrated several
feet into the pavement. And as a result of the tremendous impact
of the collapse and resulting debris, two of the facades at the
Barclay-Vesey Building were brutally affected. The face of the
brick-and-limestone building had substantial holes that peered out
onto the destruction of the World Trade Center complex, and much
of the carved limestone was shattered well beyond repair.
The 32-story building had been designed by
McKenzie Voorhees & Gmelin Architects as the first Art Deco
skyscraper, with a height of nearly 500 feet. At the time of its
opening, its designers were awarded the Architectural League of
New York's gold medal of honor in 1927 for "fine expression
of the new industrial age." It was named the Barclay-Vesey
Building after the streets to its north and south.
Although much of the exterior is brick, the
feature elements of the facade are limestone, including large
cubic pieces as well as ornately carved panels. The carvings
depict a broad range of designs, with images of a bell -- New York
Telephone's icon -- as a recurring theme throughout.
|
|
Replicating
classic stonework
To reproduce the original limestone
carvings that were destroyed, Tishman Construction, the general
contractor, selected Petrillo Stone Corp. of Mt. Vernon, NY.
Owners Ralph and Frank Petrillo of Petrillo Stone Corp. explained
that their company has had a history of working with Tishman and
that its proximity to lower Manhattan made them a nice fit for the
job. "We spent days and days on the scaffolding,"
explained Frank Petrillo, who added that measurements are still
being taken on a continual basis.
To handle such a challenging task,
Petrillo's carving team includes some of the New York area's top
artisans in the field, including Bob Carpenter, who trained as a
carver in Europe and heads the team; Michael Orekunrin, a master
stone carver who was educated in Nigeria and formerly worked at
the Cathedral of St. John the Divine for Cathedral Stoneworks; and
shop foreman Doug Breitbart. The team also includes carvers and
stonecutters Pooran Sanicharra, Ramesh Jodubar, Celine Canon and
Johnny Parbhu; sandblasters Alvin Green and "Scap"
Sahadeo; plannerman Fred Clayton and sawyer Joe Mangan. Alex Vays
was the project manager for Petrillo Stone Corp.
To rebuild what was lost at the Barclay-Vesey
Building on September 11, the carving team relied on what had
survived the attack. Although two of the structure's facades were
severely damaged, the stonework on the other two facades remained
largely intact. And fortunately, many of the limestone designs
that were destroyed on the building could also be found on the
extant facades.
The first step in replicating the stonework
was to take photographs and create molds of the existing stonework
at the building. "We wanted to simplify things as much as
possible," said Carpenter. "Every time I look at [the
facade], I see something else. I took 30 to 40 molds of different
areas, and we took pictures of everything. Then we took those to
Astoria Graphics, and they blew them up to full size."
The images of the stonework are used to make
latex matting that outlines the surface designs of the stonework.
This matting is then placed over the slabs so they can be
sandblasted in the same way that stone monuments are processed. A
sand-blasting unit --purchased by Petrillo specifically for the
Barclay-Vesey Building restoration -- is then used on the panels
to achieve the necessary depth of the designs. Then, the artisans
use routers set at a low speed to make sharper corners on the
surface designs. By taking these steps, the carvers are able to
complete the detailing of what is already dimensioned, and they do
not have to spend an excessive amount of time removing surface
material.
"We wanted to keep everything as close
to the original as possible," Carpenter said. "The
[original carvers] were brilliant. From the street level, you
really learn the feel of the building. Even at two stories up, the
detailing of the panels is incredible." To further convey the
character of the original facade, the full-sized photos of the
stonework are set up in the shop for the carvers to reference
while they work.
The limestone is quarried by Victor Oolitic
Stone Co. of Bloomington, IN, and it is cut into slabs by Michael
& Sons of Bloomfield, IN. While the thinner slabs are 5 or 6
inches in thickness, some of the pieces were much larger. At the
entrance, for example, pieces are as thick as 16 inches.
Before being delivered to the job site in
Manhattan, all of the finished pieces are classified by number at
Petrillo's shop so the installers can easily determine exactly
where each piece should be installed. In total, the project will
require 5,000 cubic feet of Indiana limestone, with 2,000 square
feet of finished surface area.
In addition to the limestone, the project
also requires approximately 500 cubic feet of Stony Creek granite
for the base of the building. This stone was quarried in
Connecticut by Granicor, a Canadian firm, and it is supplied
through Furlong & Lee of New York.
The reconstruction of the Barclay-Vesey
Building is expected to be completed by September of this year.
Petrillo Stone Corp. is also responsible for the installation of
the new limestone and granite, and it is starting work on the
project this month with a crew of six to nine workers.
|
Michael Reis is the editor
of Stone World. /
Ties to Tradition

The skyscraper inspired both fear and awe.
( Rendering from the 1920's by Hugh Ferris)
The glories
of the machine age were not accepted unconditionally. Some beheld the
changes with misgivings and even fear. For many, the world was moving
too fast, and they struggled to come to terms with the changes and
recapture a sense of continuity with the past. To make sense of the
skyscraper and the machine age, writers of the time tried to historicize
and humanize the tall structures by placing them within an ancient
tradition and emphasizing the contributions and skill of the individual
laborer.
Some writers
of the 1930's did not treat the skyscraper as a break from the past, but
as another step in a continuing architectural tradition. These
comparisons not only calmed those that were afraid of the speed and size
that the modern age brought, but also justified the corporate gluttony
of the skyscraper in a time of economic depression.
"Were not even the
cathedrals extravagant, fantastic, and a little insane? Were they not
built less for use than in order that the proud citizen might show
what his community could do, and may not we be permitted to fling our
towers into the sky with the same wanton exuberance?"
("Skyscrapers")
"Just as the
rulers and great nobles of Europe, the princes of India, and the long
line of Chinese dynasts, used architecture to exalt themselves in
their publics' eyes, and as the surest monument to their achievements,
so do our industrial rulers act today" (Dewing,
"Towers" 593).
"If the race
itself is a competition in advertising, so, in a manner of speaking ,
have been all the competitions in tall buildings from the time when
Pharaoh vied with Pharaoh matching tomb against tomb, to the pious
rivalry of the cathedral builders, each seeking to raise a pointed
arch or a spire nearer to God" (Brock).
Alongside
these attempts to root the skyscraper in the past and justify its
extravagance was an even greater effort to humanize the skyscraper, to
make it a product and symbol of the people. In his essay "The
Relation of the Skyscraper to our Life" Barclay-Vesey
Building architect Ralph Walker believes that the difference between
the great structures of the past and the tall buildings of the twentieth
century was the human factor. "Where we have a tall structure that
has no relation to death like the pyramids, or to religion like the
Parthenon, which was placed on a high elevation to emphasize the
position of a goddess we have something of a human need."
The emphasis
on the worker is found consistently in the writings about the Chrysler
Building. In the promotional brochure the story of Walter P. Chrysler is
told as the idealization of the American dream, the rise of the common
laborer through hard work and ingenuity to the top of America's fastest
growing industry. More important than story of Chrysler is the
importance of the workers captured in the mural on the ceiling of the
lobby painted by Edward Trumball.
"Here was the base
and also the central theme: brawny man power, symbolic of the vitality
and the force typical of our age. Here, too, at the root of the mural
was the symbol that Mr. Chrysler wished to dominate the whole: The
power of the individual worker who labors with his hands, the muscled
giant whose brain directs his boundless energy to the attainment of
the triumphs of this mechanical era in that never-ending struggle to
bend the elements to his will" (15).
In Fortune's
four part special report called "Skyscraper" an entire section
was devoted to the workers and their tools. The articles assure the
reader that the worker has not been lost, just changed and that
"these are the new artisans."
"The
trouble with all the talk about the decay of artisan ship is that it is
true. It has always been true. It was true when the last wattle-weaver
died and they took to building houses of brick. And it will be true when
the tools and machinery of the contemporary arts are replaced by atomic
explosions...The master-workmen of our time drive steel to steel with
hammer strokes of air. But they still depend upon the judgment of hand
and eye. And their necks are still breakable" (27).
According to
Fortune, the lives of the steel workers were exciting, and
dangerous. Most of the writings created a portrait of the fine life of
the American steel worker. The following pictures were run with a full
article on riveting, quoted below.
 |
"The
gang photographed on page 90 is Eagle's Gang, a veteran of the
Forty Wall Street [Manhattan Bank Building] job, reputed in the
trade to be one of the best gangs in the city. The gang takes
its name from its heater and organizer, E. Eagle, a native of
Baltimore. It is the belief of timekeepers, foreman, and the
leaders of other gangs that Mr. Eagle is a man of property in
his home town and indulges in the sport of riveting for
mysterious reasons. There are also myths about the gun-man and
the bucker-up, brothers named Bowers from some South Carolina
town. They are said never to speak. Even in a profession where
no man is able to speak, their silence stands out. The catcher
is George Smith, a New Yorker. There are no stories about
George" (28).
|
Writings
about the skyscraper also attempted to include not only those who worked
on the skyscraper but those who worked in and around it.
"The skyscraper, ever
concentrating more people above the same areas of ground, gives the
tenancy incalculable momentum and on the public's content with this
new way of living the success of the skyscraper depends" (Dewing,
"Towers" 590).
In a series
of articles in the North American Review of 1931, Arthur Dewing
discussed the public's architectural rights in relation to the
skyscraper. For the most part Dewing is against the skyscraper as
"an elevation of industry above mankind." However he also
argues that every citizen owns part of the tall buildings on the logic
that if the corporations mortgage the building from a bank and the bank
depends on thousands of common people with savings accounts then we all
own some little piece, however small, of the skyscrapers and should have
a say in their construction. It is a rather ridiculous argument by
today's standards, but it is representative of the conscious effort to
empower the people in the face of the rapidly expanding urban jungle.
Perhaps
nowhere is the effort to qualify and humanized the skyscraper more
clearly illustrated than in the display on the observation deck of the
Chrysler Building. Here the Chrysler Building is part of the past,
rising up out of a goat farm with the help of the hand made tools of
Walter himself. It is a fairy tale, told to those that needed to cling
to the traditions and ways of the past to usher in the marvels of the
machine.

"One of
the features of the observation floor will be an exhibition at the
entrance which will include a picture of the Chrysler Building site as
it was slightly more than fifty years ago--a goat farm, and another of
the old four-story buildings which were torn down to make way for the
present structure. Between these two pictures will be displayed the
mechanics' tools which Mr. Chrysler made with his own hands, and above
this, as if rising out of the tool box, will be a drawing of the new
building" ("Finishing Touches").
The fairy
tale of individualism wrought by the machine carries over into the
marketing of Chrysler's automobiles. The ads emphasize the mythic
American individual, asking the prospective buyer to ignore the reality
of thousands of identical Chryslers rolling off the assembly line day
after day. (Click on the ads to see them enlarged.)
|
Was partly
damaged due to the Sept. 2001 terrorist attacks. The nearby World
Trade Center towers collapsed. |
| - |
The lobby
goes through the middle of the building from Washington to West
Streets, with each entrance having its own address (Washington
Street is nowadays closed to motor traffic and paved). |
| - |
The
152-meter building is considered to be the first Art Deco skyscraper
and its designers were also awarded the Architectural League of New
York's gold medal of honor for 1927 for fine expression of the new
industrial age. |
| - |
The form
of the building was decided upon after studies of relation between
land cost and construction cost, a 32-storey design was chosen as
the most economical. |
| - |
The
massive form with floors of 4,830 m² without any light courts was
possible because the telephone installations didn't require natural
light. |
| - |
Drawing
from Saarinen's Chicago Tribune competition entry, the brick-clad
building is topped with a short, sturdy tower, with the vertical
piers ending on "battlements" on top and with sculptural
ornaments on the setbacks. |
| - |
The
entrances are decorated with bronze engravings with a main theme of
bells, the symbol of the Bell Telephone Company. |
| - |
A neo-Romanesque vaulted
arcade runs the whole length of the Vesey Street side. |
| - |
The lobby floor is covered
with bronze plates depicting the construction of New York's
telephone network, and the ceiling has frescoes with the theme of
the history of communication. |
| - |
The building occupies an
entire rhomboid-shaped block, and was built to accommodate office
space for more than 5,000 workers. |
| - |
The viewer is constantly
presented with two conflicting images of the tower: an
obliquely-angled mass and a steel-supported facade with angles sharp
as paper creases. |
|